This is a review-type article from the Irish Examiner from yesterdays NFL division 1 final between Dublin and Cork. The article mainly focuses on the three areas where Cork lost the game. This review tries to summarize to use the current state of affairs following the game.
Reviews give us an experts opinion on an a certain topic and this is the case here. It is well structured and easy to understand, With numbered points accompanied by headings, pictures and videos. From point on we can see how well he analysed the performance of Cian O’Sullivan and his presence at the back. He also indicates how O’Sullivans defensive mindset allowed the likes of Jack McCaffrey to venture forward more often, which was one of the main reasons Dublin won the game, as Jack was at the heart of many of Dublin’s ‘good play.’
It gives readers a good indication where the game was one and lost, and a review on a match should do exactly that. It is both well written, easy to understand and informative. Although it asks the question ‘How do you stop Jack McCaffrey?’ It goes onto explain the only possible way may be to sacrifice a player just to disrupt his runs, possibly the first time we have seen a man marking job on a defender.
Seeing as it is an Irish Examiner review, it would have to take a Munster angle on its last point. As the writer rightly points out, Cork have been seen as far more defensive this season than in previous years, but still got cut open by Dublin. The question he poses is one which will divide opinion, will Kerry and other Munster teams try to press like Dublin did or will we see Cork playing with less space between their lines?
Overall it is a well written review-based piece with an angle on how Cork were defeated. One could easily see where the game was one and lost from this piece, exactly what a review of a match should include.